Ad Here  
500/500 The wily old fox Of discrimination and rights Nitish swords Modi Britain lobs a bomb. But it won’t explode. RaGa bowls a decent over Rajiv killers escape the gallows Resolving disputes: Scotland, Ajit, Dhoni A judgment that shocked a nation’s conscience The curious case of the missing maid Modi sells a Dream? Sehwag...No soft edges The death of cash Brick gets pricked From Gungi Gudiya to Iron Lady Psephologists fail the wisdom of crowds Throwing ink is fine Flight into danger PM Watch The car dealer and the cabbie stories… A ride around the city Editor unplugged The return of the muffler man The future is here Privatise the Railways Being taken for a ride The KING is a fugitive Bleeding Blue Walking into the sunset FITTING farewell Odd-Even Plan The broken window The flawed “Pakistan policy” The loser is … CRICKET Cracking the CA code Why we get a compromised deal People vs. Collins The case of the suspicious husband Culture of suave, gentle and British becoming extinct... Two leaves merged? The right to reject Two more for Modi Lovely Banking experience End of the world and the moving finger... Educational shame What a judgment Sir-ji WAR-MONGERING and a national pastime Of mercy petition and mercy killing Waylaid on the National Highway A troubled fortnight The other side of the Olympic divide Noise on Social Networks The fight along the border the lost generation... Greater than the greatest ?
The right to reject

I have always held the view that the right to vote does not mean an obligation to vote; in fact,it means the right not to vote. It’s simple. If I have the right to claim reimbursement for expenses incurred, it does not, by any stretch of imagination, mean that I have a duty to claim it.

Now comes to life the hitherto mysterious Rule 49O.  Earlier, you could go to the polling booth, not take the ballot slip but instead ask the officer for the form enshrined in 49O and fill it up; indicating that you are voting for no one. Can you think of anything more spectacularly stupid than that?  Mark it, here you are being openly asked to tell the polling officer your voting choice. That violates the right to secret ballot enshrined in the Constitution. No wonder, very few opted for it.

Cut to the Supreme Court. Their lordships have sat up, taken notice and announced their verdict. That this option of voting for nobody should be inbuilt into the EVM machines. If the right to reject is to be there, its only fair that it goes straight to the voting slip. And that’s what has happened. Result: enter a new candidate, “None of the above,” aka NOTA.

So far, so good. I agree that this is path-breaking. But look at the oddities. First, if I don’t want to vote, I must go there and tell the world that I don’t vote to vote for nobody. Can’t I do that by simply staying back at home?  Secondly, if my NOTA vote has to have any meaning, it should be mandated that if NOTA wins the popular vote, none of the candidates should be selected. That’s what is respecting the electorate. Not the rank stupidity of walking up till the booth and returning without voting for zero benefit. It’s like enrolling for the war and, at the time of the battle, throwing one’s hands up and saying, “Boss I am returning home.”

To those who argue that there is a moral obligation to vote I ask, “where does this morality spring from.” If there is a moral obligation then why have Rule 49O?  Merely because Dr. Abdul Kalam as president went and voted doesn’t mean I should vote. In fact I have my own reservations about  presidents and governors voting. And because I don’t vote does not mean I can’t ask why politicians aren’t functioning. After all, every other person questions the skills of our cricketers and our actors without having ever graduated beyond gully cricket, book cricket and throwing tantrums at home.

I belong to a generation that unfortunately considers itself to be the lost generation. First, Rajiv Gandhi promised to race us into the 21st century. The clock, not Gandhi, took us there. Next, Manmohan Singh promised economic Eldorado. Today, we are in the brink of becoming a basket case. The AGP in Assam, the product of a students’ movement turned out to be no better than those born and bred in the cesspool of politics. A loss of faith in the political system is bad; but do we have a choice?

Look at those who have gone to the top. They are uncivil, lacking in public courtesy, conduct debates in a scream -and-shout approach thinking that decibel levels are more important than the intelligent quotient. Lying, ranting and using language uncharacteristic of seniors has become part of life. Until there are meaningful sea changes in the political landscape it would be ridiculous to suggest compulsory voting.  

‘NOTA’ is a game changer. But for it to have meaning, you have to announce re-election if NOTA wins.  Do that and you will see the disenchanted turning up at the polling booths in drove.

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236