Ad Here  
August
September
October
November
December
January
 
 
the lost generation... Bleeding Blue Brick gets pricked 500/500 The broken window PM Watch Sehwag...No soft edges Culture of suave, gentle and British becoming extinct... End of the world and the moving finger... Of discrimination and rights Flight into danger Educational shame RaGa bowls a decent over Of mercy petition and mercy killing Nitish swords Modi The right to reject WAR-MONGERING and a national pastime What a judgment Sir-ji Privatise the Railways A judgment that shocked a nation’s conscience The fight along the border Greater than the greatest ? FITTING farewell From Gungi Gudiya to Iron Lady Resolving disputes: Scotland, Ajit, Dhoni Cracking the CA code The wily old fox People vs. Collins Lovely Banking experience Being taken for a ride Rajiv killers escape the gallows Psephologists fail the wisdom of crowds Britain lobs a bomb. But it won’t explode. Why we get a compromised deal The car dealer and the cabbie stories… The case of the suspicious husband The KING is a fugitive Throwing ink is fine Waylaid on the National Highway Noise on Social Networks The loser is … CRICKET Odd-Even Plan The other side of the Olympic divide Modi sells a Dream? The flawed “Pakistan policy” The curious case of the missing maid Two more for Modi The future is here Walking into the sunset Two leaves merged? The death of cash The return of the muffler man A ride around the city Editor unplugged A troubled fortnight
 
The curious case of the missing maid
In New York, a maid (Sangeeta Richard) goes missing. The maid’s employer, a suave diplomat, (Devyani Khobragade) files a missing person complaint with the Police. Nothing happens. Then, one day, New York’s hotshot attorney (Preet Bharara) dramatically arrests the diplomat. In distant India, all hell breaks loose. The relationship between the two nations nosedives even as the India’s Minister (Salman Khurshid) thunders, “I will not enter Parliament until her dignity is restored.

There are just too many things in the Devyani Khobragade case that doesn’t add up.  Let me first begin with the math.

We are told that the domestic help, Sangeeta Richard, needed to be paid $4500. Somewhere we are told that against an hourly rate of $9 plus she was paid just a third, $3 plus. My math tells me that this would mean working about 500 hours (4500/9) a month. At 25 days a month, its 20 hours a day; at 30 days a month it’s about 17 hours a day. Elsewhere, we are told that she was paid $1500 (a one third pay). This translates into Rs 90,000. And yet she is said to have received Rs 30,000. Somewhere along the line, I guess, I am missing something.

Next, the visa fraud. Are they suggesting that the Dy. Consular General signed the visa application document? I doubt; of-course I no means of checking. If she did she could be held guilty of fraud if that application did say the payment would be $4500. If she didn’t and merely entered into a separate agreement I am not sure whether a fraud actually happened. Yes it would mean that she wasn’t paying the minimum wage but it can’t be said she committed a visa felony.

Let’s move on to the consideration.  I am no lawyer but I have a few questions. Can two consenting adults not enter into an agreement to be paid differently from what the law might mandate? A domestic help who gets a net saving of Rs 30,000/- per month, aside of gifts and other perks, would be jumping at the offer because she knows that a pay of $4500 aka Rs 270,000/- is impossible.

Remember the Rs 30,000 is straight saving as she gets free accommodation, free food and free gadgets. Okay the notifications may say that these are not addable although any sane person would like it to be added to constitute a “cost to company”.  It’s ridiculous that $4500 needs to be paid irrespective of whether you provide boarding and lodging facilities.  There are young CAs in the USA who draw $6000 a month with no freebies thrown in.

There are a few things here, which are inconsequential. Like: the Khobragades having an apartment in Adarsh. Like: as is alleged the rules being altered in 1999 for Khobragade to pick a foreign language of her choice. Like: the fact that Sangeeta Richard told her daughter that she was being treated well in the house of the Khobragades.

What matters is the ridiculousness of the situation. I am not neurotic but I smell conspiracy. Surely, the US is not the home for impeccable human rights treatment. Their own conduct in the bail out of their journalist who shot down two Pakistanis, ostensibly in self-defence, then in the bailout of a consular in a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and of rising the din in the case of a petty theft by an American in a mall in Singapore, is pathetic. That America should to fight for a non-decrepit housemaid, fly down the family of the ‘victim’ surreptiously before arresting Khobragade, foolishly slam the Indian judicial system all shows that there is more to this than what meets the eye. And this ‘more-to-this’ is not something that is going to be palatable.  Richard’s background could give us some sensational clues.

Now none of this is to suggest that laws can be broken. In fact, we Indians have the tendency to be elastic with law. If we don’t like a law, let’s lobby for its modification. Also it’s time we withdrew the privileges accorded to all American diplomats. Search their baggage on arrival and frisk. This is the only language Preet Bharara’s adopted country understands. For often, these men have their brains and butt interchanged.

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
RELATED NEWS
ABOUT IE
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
 
PRIVACY POLICY
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
 
CONTACT US
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Guindy,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236
EMAIL: indecom1968@gmail.com