Ad Here  
Flight into danger What a judgment Sir-ji The loser is … CRICKET Two more for Modi The flawed “Pakistan policy” 500/500 Bleeding Blue Nitish swords Modi The curious case of the missing maid Waylaid on the National Highway Resolving disputes: Scotland, Ajit, Dhoni Brick gets pricked The wily old fox Culture of suave, gentle and British becoming extinct... The right to reject Lovely Banking experience RaGa bowls a decent over The other side of the Olympic divide From Gungi Gudiya to Iron Lady Sehwag...No soft edges Why we get a compromised deal End of the world and the moving finger... Walking into the sunset The future is here People vs. Collins Odd-Even Plan Cracking the CA code Modi sells a Dream? The car dealer and the cabbie stories… Rajiv killers escape the gallows WAR-MONGERING and a national pastime the lost generation... Being taken for a ride PM Watch A ride around the city A judgment that shocked a nation’s conscience The KING is a fugitive FITTING farewell Of mercy petition and mercy killing The return of the muffler man The fight along the border Two leaves merged? The death of cash Of discrimination and rights The broken window Greater than the greatest ? Privatise the Railways The case of the suspicious husband Noise on Social Networks A troubled fortnight Psephologists fail the wisdom of crowds Throwing ink is fine Educational shame Editor unplugged Britain lobs a bomb. But it won’t explode.
The curious case of the missing maid
In New York, a maid (Sangeeta Richard) goes missing. The maid’s employer, a suave diplomat, (Devyani Khobragade) files a missing person complaint with the Police. Nothing happens. Then, one day, New York’s hotshot attorney (Preet Bharara) dramatically arrests the diplomat. In distant India, all hell breaks loose. The relationship between the two nations nosedives even as the India’s Minister (Salman Khurshid) thunders, “I will not enter Parliament until her dignity is restored.

There are just too many things in the Devyani Khobragade case that doesn’t add up.  Let me first begin with the math.

We are told that the domestic help, Sangeeta Richard, needed to be paid $4500. Somewhere we are told that against an hourly rate of $9 plus she was paid just a third, $3 plus. My math tells me that this would mean working about 500 hours (4500/9) a month. At 25 days a month, its 20 hours a day; at 30 days a month it’s about 17 hours a day. Elsewhere, we are told that she was paid $1500 (a one third pay). This translates into Rs 90,000. And yet she is said to have received Rs 30,000. Somewhere along the line, I guess, I am missing something.

Next, the visa fraud. Are they suggesting that the Dy. Consular General signed the visa application document? I doubt; of-course I no means of checking. If she did she could be held guilty of fraud if that application did say the payment would be $4500. If she didn’t and merely entered into a separate agreement I am not sure whether a fraud actually happened. Yes it would mean that she wasn’t paying the minimum wage but it can’t be said she committed a visa felony.

Let’s move on to the consideration.  I am no lawyer but I have a few questions. Can two consenting adults not enter into an agreement to be paid differently from what the law might mandate? A domestic help who gets a net saving of Rs 30,000/- per month, aside of gifts and other perks, would be jumping at the offer because she knows that a pay of $4500 aka Rs 270,000/- is impossible.

Remember the Rs 30,000 is straight saving as she gets free accommodation, free food and free gadgets. Okay the notifications may say that these are not addable although any sane person would like it to be added to constitute a “cost to company”.  It’s ridiculous that $4500 needs to be paid irrespective of whether you provide boarding and lodging facilities.  There are young