Ad Here  
End of the world and the moving finger... Lovely Banking experience A troubled fortnight The right to reject A ride around the city FITTING farewell WAR-MONGERING and a national pastime The wily old fox The curious case of the missing maid the lost generation... Psephologists fail the wisdom of crowds Walking into the sunset People vs. Collins Of discrimination and rights The future is here Cracking the CA code Why we get a compromised deal The return of the muffler man Britain lobs a bomb. But it won’t explode. Noise on Social Networks Odd-Even Plan Rajiv killers escape the gallows Editor unplugged From Gungi Gudiya to Iron Lady The other side of the Olympic divide RaGa bowls a decent over The flawed “Pakistan policy” The car dealer and the cabbie stories… Sehwag...No soft edges Bleeding Blue 500/500 Two more for Modi Two leaves merged? Flight into danger The KING is a fugitive Culture of suave, gentle and British becoming extinct... What a judgment Sir-ji Resolving disputes: Scotland, Ajit, Dhoni The death of cash Brick gets pricked A judgment that shocked a nation’s conscience Greater than the greatest ? Privatise the Railways The broken window Being taken for a ride The fight along the border The loser is … CRICKET Throwing ink is fine Modi sells a Dream? Educational shame PM Watch Of mercy petition and mercy killing Nitish swords Modi Waylaid on the National Highway The case of the suspicious husband
Of mercy petition and mercy killing

I have always been against death penalty because I believe that in that case there is no distinction between the State and the accused.  I agree that there are impressive arguments for capital punishment, including the right to defence; but there are equally impressive arguments against it, including the one that man has no right to play God. The final nail in the death penalty saga is the president’s right to grant mercy.

I am no legal brain but if the President is going to be the final arbiter, then what role did the courts play?  And if the President’s decision can be subject to judicial review, then why in the first place could the courts have not decided it? The short point: capital punishment, a.k.a death penalty, is anachronistic in modern civilisation.  Imagine a situation where after a death verdict is given and executed, it comes to light that the accused was innocent. There are enough stories of false charges and wrongful judgments.

Those who think that capital punishment is a deterrent against crime are sadly mistaken. It can at best stop that person from committing the crime (joke intended). Its presence in the statute, analysis has shown, has actually increased crime. Unbelievable, but true.


Mercy killing

Yet, it may sound odd that I should abhor death penalty but favour mercy killing, a.k.a euthanasia. After all, is it not the same as man playing God? Well, it is not. There are some practical reasons. Take the case of people with advanced malignancy. Or people who have no chance of survival. Or those who have been turned into a vegetative state.  True, modern medicine can work miracles but are we to wait for the one in a million chance to click? It’s all very fine to say we must allow the comatose to live. But what about the medical bill? Would the government support that? Or will they, beyond a point, provide things free of cost.  Well, it’s not just the medical cost, though that by itself could kill the living. My point is, “What about the patient’s pain?” Surely, the dead don’t feel the pain.

Somewhere down the line one has to be practical. How do we want to remember our near and dear ones? Do we want to see and remember them in the vegetative state that they were in? Or do we want to remember them in the cheerful, hale and hearty way they lived? Do we, by not allowing euthanasia, allow that to happen?  I think one must have a right to a say in it. I do understand that this is controversial. But a team of medical professionals and the immediate family should be allowed to take a decision.

Also where a person wishes to die, because he can’t bear the pain of living, his wish must be respected. One may ask what is the guarantee that his wish was not forced. Well, there are no guarantees in life.

Author :
Reported On :
Sector :
Shoulder :
IE, the business magazine from south was launched in 1968 and pioneered business journalism in south. Through the 45 years IE has been focusing on well-presented and well-researched articles. When giants in the industry stumbled to keep pace with the digital revolution, IE stayed affixed embracing technology.
Read more
Economist Communications Ltd is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected.
Read more
You agree that your use of this Website and the purchase of the magazine will be governed by these terms and conditions.
Read more
S-15, Industrial Estate,
Chennai - 600 032.
PHONE: +91 44 22501236